№21760
LOL
so much for the KDE fanboys who were using gnome going wayland only as an excuse to shit on it
№21769
who actually cares? i dont see any difference
№21777
Thats aryan. Not for users but for dev time and complexity. Same reason I like zink so much: if it ever becomes mature, it could unify every openGL driver on linux (ev&doe this will never happen because shitvidia). Less code, split across projects or not, means more devs per LoC which means better code which makes less code. X is bloat, Wayland gooder because maintenance, not much heckin memory usage or speed for the user, but that does generally follow with maturity so long as trannies and jeets are gatekept
№21779
>>21777The LoC savings here is from cutting all the x11 support from KDE. Also I mean LoC loosely because there will always be some nigger who ruins the analog by removing returns or shit akin to -Os esque instruction count but not cycle minimizing
№21781
>>21777>I like zink so much: if it ever becomes mature, it could unify every openGL driver on linux>hmm, instead of relying on a simple display server that every window manager could depend on lets make our own abstractions and protocols! that's so smart!we have mutter (gnome), wlroots (sway), kwin (kde) and smithay (library in rust) all competing to do the same thing. that's the *exact opposite* of what you said
wayland has fewer modern window managers compared to x11, and that's for a good reason. wayland is making developers' lives hell