№109252[Quote]
why do people care about aircrafts? it seems autistic
№109260[Quote]
>>109255you just enlightened me
№109280[Quote]
>>109258>Hawker Hunter >O-2 SkymasterAutistic choices, but still very aryan
№109337[Quote]
>>109288its hard to believe that the retards thought this would work
it still looks kind of cool
№109339[Quote]
>>109337there's a purity to the idea of having no wings just speed. The sentiment is cool
№109470[Quote]
>>109252The white man has a spiritual connection to vehicles and machinery. During Operation Overlord, Spitfire pilots would deliver beer to troops on the ground. Once the
(((generals))) banned this, they'd smuggle it, with one particular technique being to fill a fuel tank with beer.
№109531[Quote]
File: DC3.jpg 📥︎ (146.11 KB, 1300x956) c149836803b8286ee3bc5678d101d1120ImgOps
File: il2.jpg 📥︎ (573.86 KB, 1200x687) 7a79d1de07c270e5c51f7e3c93fc7a390ImgOps
I would love to fly one of these.
№109578[Quote]
>>109531transport planes are extremely cool, Il-2 also rocks
I definitely need to mention the C-119, it looks really unique
№109932[Quote]
File: huey.jpg 📥︎ (535.01 KB, 2560x1828) e6f6f0424314a2e6004c948275c664b10ImgOps
File: b2.png 📥︎ (39.53 KB, 1200x900) eb826ef2cca384ceb73a7b2e3c10841e0ImgOps
here are some other planes (and a helicopter) that I also like.
№110073[Quote]
>>110071The first pic is a lander from the Venera program right? Always found that program interesting.
№110166[Quote]
>>109470i think the americans made ice cream that way in the pacific. the low temperature of the tank and vibration of the engine would make cream into ice cream
№110708[Quote]
>>109246 (OP)I wouldn't say they're a favorite but the helis used before the Vietnam War (mainly the Korean War) always interested me.
<It's interested me to see how they developed, well that and nobody really talks about them that much
№110729[Quote]
>>110710I've been randomly thinking about how nice it would be to live in a Catalina for about ten years now. Just imagine travelling the world, stopping off at random exotic shitholes and Pacific islands to drink rum and coconut juice before setting off again.
№110922[Quote]
>>110746I barely ever played any simulators but it seems interesting.
>49 eurosnever mind
№111117[Quote]
>>111050theres a lockheed T-33 for sale on facebook btw
№111157[Quote]
>>110708because they're so fucking ugly
№111159[Quote]
>>1111511946 is also amazing, however I'd reccomend Il-2 Great Battles more
I am aware of the smaller amount of aircraft and a higher price, it geniuenly is super fun and doesn't look like raisin. ALso it's really optimised so it runs smoothly
№111162[Quote]
>>111159I honestly wouldn't. It pains me because I actually have more hours in GB than 1946 and I feel strange sympathy for the developers but I recently uninstalled it and haven't looked back. Yeah it's very pretty and it's a better simulator and has a nice and detailed damage model but as a game I'm of the mind that it's just worse in every way.
>bad communityMaybe it's because I've never joined some sekrit club that flies missions or whatever but my impression of the public servers is that they combine the worst of War Thunder and sim autism by being an air deathmatch that's completely dominated by 10k hour nolifers hunting noobs in packs. The 1946 community I'm in is way more relaxed and mostly plays co-op missions but even the dogfight mode seems like it'd be more fair and exciting because the maps are smaller and most seem to play with icons enabled and with quick respawning
>less plane varietyThis hurts dynamic campaigns because it limits the sorts of missions you can fly and makes them feel a lot narrower and artificial. Modded campaigns in 1946 just feel a lot more alive, with random bombers, recon aircraft, etc flying around on their own silly little missions. It's not that bad in GB but I'd give the edge to 1946 anyway.
>slower and worse aiThis is really what kills the singleplayer for me. I think a lot of the feeling of sluggishness to me comes from longer loading times, but the G force tolerances in GB are waaaaaay more punishing and yeah ok I guess that's realistic but it isn't fun to have 5 minutes of decent manoeuvering and then your pilot is exhausted for the rest of your mission, particularly since the AI is awful, or at least it was back when I played. In 1946 the AI is deadly at high veterancies and apparently it's even better in the final versions of the game (BAT mod is on earlier version), while the GB AI is just stupid. It can't dogfight at all, if your planes are roughly equal then it'll spin around in circles forever until you kill it or your pilot passes out while if its plane is faster or more powerful, it'll slowly climb away forever.
And of course, if you want to get into it then you're stuck having to dish out $$$ for a billion different expansions, public servers rotate their time period so you may find you're just not allowed to fly anymore and obviously 1946 doesn't have this problem.
№111165[Quote]
>>111094I already know how to pirate, but still thank you :).
I just think that 49 euros for a game is ridiculous evendoe games now cost 60-80€ (like who can waste that much money???).
№111170[Quote]
>>111162Very fair points, in some ways I prefer 1946 aswell and I also feel a sympathy for the devs (probably because they made the best Fw 190 simulation out there geg). It's true the multiplayer enviroment in GB is fucking miserable. I haven't played a single MP match without being frustrated and hunted by absolute sweating niggers, not to mention the high realism, which makes some aircraft barely flyable. I just play campaigns and quick missions with my own pace, I find fun in simple missions and dogfights (sometimes with a friend in coop)
However, for me, I still enjoy GB much more for it's simple UI and straightforward flying
№111171[Quote]
>>111162Also the AI in CoD is fucking brutal aswell
№111252[Quote]
I transheart the TA-152. Is my taste raisin?
№111331[Quote]
>>111252all aircraft are kino, doesn't matter what it is.
№111348[Quote]
>>111252No not at all. The Fw190 is aryan as fvk and long wings are erotique like long legs on women.
>>111170Nice clip. Well I'm glad you're enjoying it, I think it would be nice in good company but I'm a shy gigasperg so I post on imageboards instead of getting to know other autists in niche hobbies.
№111466[Quote]
>>111170Shooting down amerimutts over europe is very gemmy
№111580[Quote]
>>111579it works fine in other flysims doebeit
№111581[Quote]
>>111580nvm it's just randomly started working after several restarts
№114835[Quote]
>>111425It was by far the best fighter of the war and when it went into mass production it hadn't even been perfected yet and STILL the performance was utterly amazing (they were like "okay it's good enough now, we gotta get it out there, we can improve the performance further later").
Vidrel is from a 20+ min long video mostly about the Bf 109 and P-51 (which was designed by a German btw), but relevant to this post is the data presented at the end of the video which is what this clip is of. These are the speed specs at various altitudes etc for the Ta 152 vs the 190 D-9 and the 109 K-4 and Spitfire XIVe and LF IXe and Tempest V and P-51 D and La-7 and Yak-3.
When I say best fighter of the war I'm thinking only of planes that were true fighters and don't count the Me 262 as a fighter in such a sense because it shouldn't be thought of in that manner because contrary to the anti-White meme-narrative (constructed in order to attempt to make Whites think Hitler foolishly caused the 262 to be delayed when in reality he had nothing whatsoever to do with its delays) about the Me 262 it was NEVER intended to be just a fighter; it was from the start intended to be a multirole PLATFORM very similar in nature to how the F35 is such a platform; it wasn't intended to be an F22 (btw there were other jet planes that WERE in contrast intended to be pure fighters like the He 162 and EF 126 and there were more sophisticated designs in the planning stages like this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WtVMSdQpUw and others equally little-known – btw the basic design for the one in that video became the Swedish SAAB 32 Lansen). But the Ta 152 was even better in some ways than the Me 262, for example in the sense that the jet engines of the 262 were much slower to react to inputs from the pilot versus the inputs on a super powerful prop-fighter like the Ta 152; much more immediate reaction, and the long-winged version could climb MUCH higher up than the Me 262. Of course the engines for the 152 were far more complicated and more expensive to build than the engines for the 262 (people usually make the mistake of assuming the jet engines were costlier or more labor intensive to make; that's not correct, rather the opposite was the case once production was up and running; a Jumo 004 jet enigne was far easier and less expensive to make vs a DB 603 for example – that was one of the to-the-Germans-at-the-time known benefits of moving over to jet engines, that they were easier and cheaper to make).
№115198[Quote]
>>115104Aryan, they should still be making aircraft that look like this
№115199[Quote]
Gemthread
№115312[Quote]
>>110746very late but YES! its so moddable its 100% worth it
№115491[Quote]
>>115489These are extremely keyed do you know about project rho
№115496[Quote]
>>115491haven't seen it before, looks like some keyed ARYANtism chow thobeit
№115514[Quote]
>>115496Yes it is highly autistic but very nice if you're one of the 120 or so Aryans on Earth who is interested in real or planned nuclear space propulsion projects during/just after the cold war (among other things, but that's the main focus)
№115557[Quote]
File: La5.jpg 📥︎ (29.11 KB, 800x306) 1fd6acfdc3d01b78b96a1c99eadccb230.071ImgOps
>>109246 (OP)Any radial engine aircraft honestly
№115749[Quote]
>>115645Project Orion GOD
№116517[Quote]
planes fly in the air
№117003[Quote]
We were so close to the stars, but then we turned around and decided to spend 50 marshall plans on niggers instead (and they are still starving and retarded anyway) because hippies clitties were leaking all over the place